Baree (Homestead Garden) as a Socio-Ecological System in Rural Assam-A Review

Authors: Sarmistha Rani Baruah
Baree (Homestead Garden) as a Socio-Ecological System in Rural Assam-A Review
DIN
IJOEAR-SEP-2026-33
Abstract

The traditional Baree, or homestead-based production system, is an important component of rural landscapes in Assam. Often perceived simply as a household garden, Baree is in fact a multifunctional socio-ecological system where biodiversity, food production, livelihoods, traditional knowledge and human well-being are closely interconnected. A typical Baree may contain many plant species including fruit trees, vegetables, spices, medicinal plants, bamboo and other multipurpose species, together with birds, insects, soil organisms and other associated biodiversity. These components collectively provide food, income, ecosystem services and cultural benefits. This review examines the Baree from a socio-ecological perspective with a focus on its contributions to biodiversity conservation, food and nutritional security, livelihood diversification and human well-being. It also discusses emerging pressures such as commercialisation, land-use change, biodiversity loss, changing lifestyles, erosion of traditional knowledge and climate change. The review argues that the value of Baree should not be assessed only through its direct economic output. Its ecological, nutritional, social and cultural functions must be considered together. Recognizing Baree as a multifunctional socio-ecological system can support more sustainable, biodiversity-friendly and climate-resilient approaches to rural development in Assam.

Keywords
Baree socio-ecological system biodiversity food security livelihoods Assam.
Introduction

In rural Assam, the Baree (homestead garden) holds a special position in every household. It represents a multifunctional homestead-based agroforestry and food-production system. In the context of Assam, the term Baree has a broader meaning than the conventional concept of a home garden as it includes agroforestry systems associated with the household compound. In Assam, 'Baree' refers to a traditional land-use practice where a variety of plant species, such as timbers, firewood, vegetables, fruits, plantation crops, spices, herbs, ornamentals, and some other elements of farming systems, such as livestock, poultry, fisheries, sericulture, beekeeping, etc., are maintained by the members of the farm family with the primary goal of fulfilling various household needs, livelihood resources, biodiversity and ecosystem services (Barua et al., 2019).

The Baree system has deep historical roots in Assam. According to literature, the practice has existed since time immemorial and was associated with Hiuen Tsang and the Mughal-era historian Shihabuddin Talish. The system became more organised during the Ahom period, particularly during the reign of Swargadeo Pratap Singha (1603–1641 AD), when Momai Tamuli Borbarua, a chief of the Revenue office, re-organised villages and promoted Baree as a self-sufficient household production system contributing to the economic well-being and self-reliance of farming families. Thus, the historical development of Baree reflects not only an agricultural practice but also an institutional approach to household-level food production, resource management and rural self-reliance (Barua et al., 2019).

Baree in Assam is not a uniform system; it takes different forms depending on its location and how the land is used. Broadly, it can be classified into three types: Integrated Baree, Meroni and Paam. Integrated Baree is the common homestead-based system, where a variety of trees, vegetables and other useful plants are grown around the house, mainly to meet household needs. Meroni, often referred to as a fenced Baree, is generally found on relatively higher land and may be used for growing seasonal crops along with timber, bamboo, citrus and other useful plants. Paam, on the other hand, is usually found in riverine areas, where cultivation practices are adapted to the seasonal flooding and changing conditions of the land (Barua et al., 2019).

The diversity and multifunctionality of Baree make it particularly relevant to contemporary discussions on biodiversity and ecosystem processes. A proper Baree provides food and nutritional security, livelihood diversification, traditional ecological knowledge and human well-being. The interaction between ecological components and household activities makes Baree an example of a socio-ecological system (SES). A socio-ecological perspective is particularly useful because humans are not external to the Baree ecosystem. Decisions on planting, conservation, harvesting, selling or replacing affect biodiversity and the ecosystem services that affect household food, income and well-being. In India, Assam is the state with the highest concentration of these Baree/homegarden systems (Sharma et al., 2022). An ICAR report estimated that Assam has around 6.4 million homegardens, covering nearly 85% of all households in the state (Barua et al., 2019). However, in recent times, increasing urbanisation, land fragmentation, commercialisation and changing lifestyles are transforming traditional multi-species Baree systems. Against this background, the present review conceptualizes Baree as a 'socio-ecological system' and examines its interconnected contributions to biodiversity, food, livelihoods, human well-being and resilience in rural Assam.

Conclusion

The discussion demonstrates that the Baree system is much more than a space for homestead farming. It is a living socio-ecological system in which people, plants, animals, birds, and other organisms coexist and interact. Through these interconnected relationships, rural households obtain food, nutrition, livelihood support, and social security. The system also helps preserve and transmit indigenous agricultural knowledge, much of which continues to be practiced by rural communities across Assam. Furthermore, rural homesteads in Assam serve as important repositories of diverse plant species and local biodiversity. These features make the Baree a multifunctional socio-ecological system with considerable potential to strengthen rural livelihoods. Greater recognition and institutional support for Baree-based activities could create local employment and income-generating opportunities, including for migrant youth who wish to return to or remain connected with their communities. From the above discussion, it can be concluded that conceptualizing the Baree as a socio-ecological system offers a more comprehensive foundation for rural development and agroecological planning. Strengthening the Baree system could also give rural youth a reason to take an interest in their homestead garden. With training, access to markets and support for small enterprises, young people could turn Baree-based activities into viable work close to home. That may help reduce migration driven by a lack of local opportunities. Thus, strengthening the Baree can build a more sustainable and resilient rural Assam.

Agriculture Journal IJOEAR Call for Papers

References
  1. Bargali, K. (2016). Traditional home gardens as a sustainable ecosystem for maintenance of biodiversity: A case study from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Journal of Biodiversity, *7*(2), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766901.2016.11884761
  2. Barooah, M., & Pathak, A. (2009). Indigenous knowledge and practices of Thengal Kachari women in sustainable management of bari system of farming. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, *8*(1), 35-40. https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/2972
  3. Barua, J. P., Ahmed, A. A., Gogoi, S., Pathak, S., & Hatibaruah, P. (2019). Baree: The home garden of Assam. Assam Agricultural University. https://www.scribd.com/document/740979427/Baree-The-Home-Garden-of-Assam
  4. Das, B. R., Bhuyan, M. J., Deka, N., & Bhattacharya, P. (2024). Unveiling the richness and socio-cultural importance of homestead agroforestry in Sivasagar District of Assam, India. Small-scale Forestry, *23*(4), 613-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-024-09580-4
  5. Das, T., & Das, A. K. (2005). Inventorying plant biodiversity in homegardens: A case study in Barak Valley, Assam, Northeast India. Current Science, *89*(1), 155-163.
  6. Deb, S., Sarkar, A., Majumdar, K., & Deb, D. (2014). Community structure, biodiversity value and management practices of traditional agroforestry systems in Tripura, North East India. Journal of Biodiversity Management & Forestry, *3*(3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4417.1000129
  7. Fernandes, E. C. M., & Nair, P. K. R. (1986). An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agricultural Systems, *21*, 279-310.
  8. Fernandes, E. C. M., & Nair, P. K. R. (1986). An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agricultural Systems, *21*(4), 279-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(86)90104-6
  9. Griffith, D. M. (2000). Agroforestry: A refuge for tropical biodiversity after fire. Conservation Biology, *14*, 325-326. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99101.x
  10. Eco Heritage. (n.d.). Baree system of farming. https://ecoheritage.cpreec.org/baree-system-of-farming/
  11. Kehlenbeck, K., & Maass, B. L. (2004). Crop diversity and classification of homegardens in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, *63*(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000049433.95038.25
  12. Kumar, B. M., & Nair, P. K. R. (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, *61*, 135-152.
  13. Mazumdar, H., Neog, M., Borthakur, A. K., Gogoi, G., Gohain, S., & Pathak, P. K. (2022). Relevance of Assamese folk song, Bihu Geet in practicing natural farming in the traditional Baree (homestead garden) system of Assam, India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, *40*(10), 810-823. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2022/v40i1031147
  14. Nicholls, C. I., & Altieri, M. A. (2004). Designing species-rich, pest-suppressive agroecosystems through habitat management. In R. Diane & C. Francis (Eds.), Agroecosystems analysis. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr43.c4
  15. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, *325*(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
  16. Prihatini, J., Iskandar, J., Partasasmita, R., & Nurjaman, D. (2018). The impacts of traditional homegarden conversion into the commercial one: A case study in Sukapura Village of the Upstream Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, *19*(5), 1926-1940. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190545
  17. Saha, S., Deka, N., & Bhagabati, A. K. (2022). Traditional homestead agroforestry systems in a floodplain village of the Brahmaputra Valley, Assam: Characteristics and functions. Journal of Rural Development, *40*(3), 404-423. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2021/v40/i3/142500
  18. Saikia, P., Choudhury, B. I., & Khan, M. L. (2012). Floristic composition and plant utilization pattern in homegardens of Upper Assam, India. Tropical Ecology, *53*(1), 105-118.
  19. Sharma, R., Mina, U., & Kumar, B. M. (2022). Homegarden agroforestry systems in achievement of sustainable development goals: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, *42*, 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00781-9
  20. Vibhuti, V., Bargali, K., & Bargali, S. S. (2019). Species composition, diversity and traditional uses of homegarden in Kumaun Himalaya, India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, *89*(9), 1415-1418. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93479
  21. Yashmita-Ulman, Kumar, A., & Sharma, M. (2017). Traditional home garden agroforestry systems: Habitat for conservation of Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus (Passeriformes: Ploceidae) in Assam, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, *9*(4), 10076-10083. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3090.9.4.10076-10083.
  22. Ngcaba, P., & Maroyi, A. (2021). Home gardens in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: A promising approach to enhance household food security and well-being. Biodiversitas, *22*, 4045-4053. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220953.
Article Preview