Effect of Feeding Fodder-based Balanced Ration on Animal’s Productivity, Fertility and Economics of Dairying in Field Conditions

Authors: Arpan Upadhyay; Nishi Roy; Maroof Ahmad; Rohit Gupta; Sunil Narbaria
DIN
IJOEAR-FEB-2026-8
Abstract

The present study evaluated the impact of green fodder–based ration balancing on milk productivity, fertility, and economics of dairy buffaloes under on-farm conditions. On-farm trials were conducted during 2018–19 to 2020–21 in the rabi season, involving five trials per year with 15 buffaloes per treatment, comparing balanced ration feeding (T2) with farmers' practice (T1). Results revealed that buffaloes under T2 recorded consistently higher average daily milk yield (6.85 ± 0.31 to 7.21 ± 0.34 L/day) with an increase of 7.0–8.91% over T1. Fertility performance improved markedly under T2, with conception rate increasing from 13.3 to 20.0% compared to 6.67–13.3% under T1. Economic analysis showed higher net returns (₹16.35 ± 0.71 to 18.28 ± 0.80 per litre of milk) and improved benefit–cost ratio (1.69–1.71) under balanced ration feeding as against 1.57–1.59 in farmers' practice. The study demonstrated that ration balancing using green fodder enhances feed utilization efficiency, improves reproductive performance, and increases profitability. Adoption of fodder-based balanced feeding can therefore serve as a cost-effective and sustainable strategy for improving dairy buffalo productivity under field conditions.

Keywords
Balanced ration Economics Fertility Green fodder Milk production On-farm trial.
Introduction

Ration balancing is the process of balancing the levels of various nutrients in the ration from available feed resources to optimize feed utilization and meet nutrient requirements for different physiological stages of animals, i.e., maintenance, production, and reproduction (FAO, 2012). A well-balanced ration plays a crucial role in enhancing animal productivity, improving fertility, and ensuring the economic sustainability of dairy farming (NRC, 2001). Animal feedstuffs are broadly classified into four groups: fodder, concentrate mixtures, feed supplements, and feed additives (Banerjee, 2018). Animals are fed two types of fodder: green and dry. Among these, green fodder is vital for maximizing fertility and production because it supplies vital minerals, vitamins, protein, and energy that promote optimal milk production, reproductive efficiency, and overall animal health (Ranjhan, 1998). Feeding a green fodder–based balanced ration improves digestion, increases milk production and quality, and reduces reliance on costly concentrate feeds. Therefore, a fodder-based dairy farming system is not only economical but also supports sustainable livestock management (Kearl, 1982).

Conclusion

The findings clearly establish that green fodder–based ration balancing significantly improves milk yield (7.0–8.91% increase), fertility (two- to three-fold higher conception rate), and economic returns (B:C ratio 1.69–1.71) in dairy buffaloes under field conditions. The intervention demonstrates that low to moderate milk-yielding buffaloes can be efficiently maintained on balanced green and dry fodder with minimal concentrate supplementation, reducing feeding costs while enhancing productivity and reproduction. The consistent performance across three consecutive years confirms the technical feasibility and economic viability of this approach. Wider dissemination through on-farm demonstrations and extension programs is recommended to enhance productivity, profitability, and sustainability of smallholder dairy farming systems in similar agro-ecological regions.

References

[1] Banerjee, G. C. (2018). A textbook of animal husbandry (8th ed.). Oxford & IBH Publishing.
[2] Bhanderi, B. M., Garg, M. R., Bhanderi, B. M., & Goswami, A. (2016). Impact of balanced feeding on the solids-not fat content of milk. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 69(3), 234–239.
[3] Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
[4] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2012). Balanced feeding for improving livestock productivity: Increase in milk production and nutrient use efficiency and decrease in methane emission (M. R. Garg, Author; FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 173). https://www.fao.org/3/i3014e/i3014e.pdf
[5] Garg, M. R., Kannan, A., Phondba, B. T., Shelke, S. K., & Sherasia, P. L. (2012). A study on the effect of ration balancing for improving milk production and reducing methane emission in lactating buffaloes under field conditions. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 65(3),226–231.
[6] Garg, M. R., Sherasia, P. L., Phondba, B. T., Shelke, S. K., & Patel, C. T. (2013). Effect of feeding balanced ration on milk production, enteric methane emission and metabolic profile in crossbred cows under field conditions. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 66(2), 113–119.
[7] Garg, M. R., Sherasia, P. L., Phondba, B. T., & Hossain, S. A. (2014). Effect of feeding a balanced ration on milk production, microbial nitrogen supply and methane emissions in field animals. Animal Production Science, 54(10), 1657–1661. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14344
[8] Kearl, L. C. (1982). Nutrient requirements of ruminants in developing countries. International Feedstuffs Institute, Utah State University.
[9] National Research Council. (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle (7th rev. ed.). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9825
[10] Ranjhan, S. K. (1998). Animal nutrition in the tropics (4th ed.). Vikas Publishing House.
[11] Sherasia, P. L., Phondba, B. T., Hossain, S. A., Patel, B. P., & Garg, M. R. (2016). Impact of feeding balanced rations on milk production, methane emission, metabolites and feed conversion efficiency in lactating cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 50(4),505–511. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.11120
[12] Sherasia, P. L., Hossain, S. A., Phondba, B. T., Pathan, F. S., & Garg, M. R. (2017). Effect of feeding green fodder in lactating buffaloes: Milk production, economics and methane emission. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 70(6), 612–618.
[13] Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods (8th ed.). Iowa State University Press.

Article Preview