Histopathological and Ultrastructural Aspects of Normal Buffalo Skin (Bubalus bubalis, LINNAEUS, 1758)
Abstract
Macroscopic and microscopic observations were performed on fragments of normal skin from the periauricular region of buffaloes. The analysis demonstrated that the skin of this species has a structural organization similar to that observed in other mammals, including humans, and consists of two main layers: the epidermis and dermis. Evaluations were conducted sequentially by light microscopy and electron microscopy, allowing characterization of the epidermis, basement membrane, and dermis, as well as their respective cellular and tissue subdivisions. The findings revealed morphological similarities between buffalo skin and that of other mammalian species.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
The buffalo Bubalus bubalis (LINNAEUS, 1758) was introduced into Brazil in 1890 from animals imported from the island of Trinidad to Marajó Island. Originating from the Asian continent, buffaloes were subsequently introduced into Europe, Oceania, and the Americas and are currently adapted to a wide variety of ecosystems worldwide (MARQUES & CARDOSO, 1997).
Since then, several breeding centers have been established throughout Brazil, contributing to the expansion of buffalo farming into different states and to increased imports of breeding females over the decades. According to IBGE data (2020), the Brazilian buffalo herd comprised approximately 1.5 million animals, with a strong concentration in the Northern region. The states of Pará and Amapá accounted for a substantial proportion of the national herd, confirming the importance of this region for buffalo production in the country. The survey recorded 1,103,630 animals in the Northern region; 131,493 in the Northeastern region; 201,304 in the Southeastern region; 94,337 in the Southern region; and 61,778 in the Central-Western region.
Worldwide, the main buffalo-producing countries are located on the Asian continent, particularly India, Pakistan, Indonesia, the Philippines, and China. In Europe, buffalo production is important in countries such as Italy, Bulgaria, and Russia, as well as in regions formerly comprising Yugoslavia.
These animals are raised mainly in natural grasslands and native pastures, although buffaloes also perform exceptionally well on firm ground and cultivated pastures. This adaptive capacity is of considerable economic importance because buffaloes are less selective regarding forage than other species of similar size. They can therefore utilize coarser feedstuffs and efficiently convert them into products of high nutritional value (MARQUES & CARDOSO, 1997).
This characteristic makes buffalo production particularly important in regions regarded as marginal or less favorable for conventional livestock farming, such as the seasonally flooded lowlands of the Amazon, coastal lowlands, wetlands of the Southern region, and the Pantanal. In this context, buffalo farming represents an important alternative for meat and milk production, enabling productive use of previously underutilized areas and expanding opportunities to obtain animal protein at relatively low cost (MARQUES & CARDOSO, 1997).
According to the Brazilian Association of Buffalo Breeders, in 2024 the Brazilian buffalo herd was estimated at approximately 3 million animals, corresponding to approximately 1.4% of the national cattle herd. Despite this relatively small proportion, Brazil has the largest buffalo herd in the Western world, demonstrating the potential for expansion of this activity. Approximately 30% of buffalo farms are devoted to milk production, and this sector has shown substantial growth in recent years (BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION OF BUFFALO BREEDERS, 2024).
Buffaloes have productive aptitudes similar to those observed in cattle of European and Indian origin and can be used for milk and meat production and as draft animals. Although they are naturally more rustic, they have a high capacity for domestication, a process dating back to prehistoric times, particularly in regions of Indochina.
Among the organs directly involved in the interaction between the organism and the environment, the skin stands out as one of the largest organs of the body and is responsible for covering the body surface. In addition to acting as a physical protective barrier against external agents, it performs several essential functions for maintaining organismal homeostasis.
The skin consists of different, closely related structures and cell populations. The epidermis is of ectodermal origin and, because it lacks its own blood supply, depends on the diffusion of nutrients from the underlying tissues. During differentiation, epidermal cells undergo progressive changes that culminate in keratinization and programmed cell death. Because of its extensive contact surface with the external environment, the skin is continuously exposed to different physical, chemical, and biological agents, making its integrity essential for protecting the organism. It also includes a connective tissue portion of mesodermal origin, the dermis. Below and continuous with the dermis lies the hypodermis, which, although it has the same origin as the dermis, is not part of the skin and merely supports it and connects it to the underlying organs (ABRAHAMSOHN, 2026).
Conclusion
Thus, despite the marked similarity in the histological organization of cattle and buffalo skin, differences were observed in epidermal and dermal thickness, the number of hair follicles, sebaceous gland morphology, and the distribution of collagen and elastic fibers. Some of these differences were more evident in the ano-caudal fold region, whereas the skin structure of the two species was more similar in the cervical region. These characteristics should be considered when comparing the cutaneous responses of cattle and buffaloes, particularly in intradermal tests.
Ultrastructural analysis demonstrated similar organization in the two species, revealing keratinocytes, desmosomes associated with tonofilaments, the basement membrane, fibroblasts, collagen fibrils, and components of the elastic system. No marked ultrastructural differences were observed between cattle and buffaloes, although the scarcity of studies, particularly in Bubalus bubalis, still limits more detailed comparisons. Thus, the findings of this study contribute to expanding knowledge of the histological and ultrastructural organization of the skin of these large ruminants.
References
- Abbasi, M., Gharzi, A., Karimi, H., & Khosravinia, H. (2008). Effects of sex on histological characteristics of various areas of skin in an Iranian native breed of sheep. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, (7), 1503-1505.
- Abdul Raheem, M. H., & Al-Hety, M. S. (1997). Histological and morphometrical study of the skin of black goat. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, *10*, 59-71.
- Abdul Raheem, M. H., Elias, A. M., & Ahmed, N. S. (2006). The correction factor of hair density in the skin of buffalo. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, *20*(2), 101-106.
- Abrahamsohn, P. (n.d.). 15-3 Skin. MOL - Online Microscopy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo. https://mol.icb.usp.br/index.php/15-3-pele/
- Al-Bideri, A. W. M. (2003). Ultrastructure and cellular organization in different anatomical sites of some adult Iraqi mammal's epidermis [Master's dissertation, Al-Qadissiya University].
- Brazilian Association of Buffalo Breeders. (n.d.). Brazilian Association of Buffalo Breeders - ABCB. https://bufalo.com.br/
- Bagi, A. S., & Vtas, K. M. (1983). Morphological skin surti buffaloes compared to that of other breeds of buffaloes and ox and its role in thermoregulation. Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, *12*, 564-582.
- Carty, C. I., Lee, A. M., Wienandt, N. A. E., Stevens, E. L., Alves, D. A., Browne, J. A., Bryan, J., Ryan, E. G., & Cassidy, J. P. (2016). Dermatosparaxis in two Limousin calves. Irish Veterinary Journal, *69*(15), 1-5.
- Cormack, D. H. (1987). Ham's histology (9th ed.). J. B. Lippincott.
- Dellmann, H. D., & Brown, E. M. (1976). Textbook of veterinary histology. Lea & Febiger.
- Gayen, S., Prasad, G., & Sinha, R. D. (1989). Comparative histological studies on the skin of Indian buffalo and Black Bengal goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, *59*, 920-924.
- Gonzalez-Santander, R. (1969). Electron microscopy techniques in biology. Aguilar.
- Hafez, E. S. E., Badreldin, A. L., & Shafei, M. M. (1955). Skin structure of Egyptian buffaloes and cattle with particular reference to sweat glands. Journal of Agricultural Science, *46*(1), 19-30.
- IBGE - Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. (2020). Buffalo herd in Brazil. https://www.ibge.gov.br/explica/producao-agropecuaria/bubalinos/br
- Jenkinson, D. M., & Nay, T. (1975). The sweat glands and hair follicles of different species of Bovidae. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, *28*(1), 55-68.
- Jolly, R. D., Alley, M. R., & O'Hara, P. J. (1973). Familial acantholysis of Angus calves. Veterinary Pathology, *10*, 473-483.
- Junqueira, L. C., & Carneiro, J. (2013). Basic histology: Text and atlas (12th ed.). Guanabara Koogan.
- Kielty, C. M., Berry, L., Whittaker, S. P., Grant, M. E., & Shuttleworth, C. A. (1993). Microfibrillar assemblies of foetal bovine skin: Developmental expression and relative abundance of type VI collagen and fibrillin. Matrix, *13*(2), 103-112.
- Lavker, R. M., & Matoltsy, A. G. (1971). Substructure of keratohyalin granules of the epidermis as revealed by high resolution electron microscopy. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, *35*(5), 575-581.
- Majeed, M. A., Naseem, M., Toor, M. A., & Khan, L. R. (1975). Alcune particolarità strutturali della pelle di bufala. Rivista di Zootecnia e Veterinaria, *6*, 519-528.
- Marques, J. R. F., & Cardoso, L. S. (1997). Buffalo production in Brazil and worldwide. In The buffalo in Brazil: Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Buffalo Production (pp. 7-42). UFBA, School of Agronomy.
- Matoltsy, A. G. (1975). Desmosomes, filaments and keratohyaline granules: Their role in the stabilization and keratinization of the epidermis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, *65*, 127-142.
- Medeiros, G. X., Riet-Correa, F., Armién, A. G., Dantas, A. F. M., Galiza, G. J. N., & Simões, S. V. D. (2012). Junctional epidermolysis bullosa in a calf. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, *24*, 231-234.
- Meyer, W., & Neurand, K. (1987). A comparative scanning electron microscopic view of the integument of domestic mammals. Scanning Microscopy, *1*(1), 169-180.
- Mohan, R. N. (1968). Diseases and parasites of buffaloes. II. Bacterial and fungal diseases. Veterinary Bulletin, (38), 647-659.
- Mülling, C. K. W. (2000). Three-dimensional appearance of bovine epidermal keratinocytes in different stages of differentiation revealed by cell maceration and scanning electron microscopic investigation. Folia Morphologica, *59*(4), 239-246.
- Naffa, R., Maidment, C., Ahn, M., Ingham, B., Hinkley, S. F. R., & Norris, G. E. (2019). Molecular and structural insights into skin collagen reveals several factors that influence its architecture. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, *128*, 509-520.
- Owen, G. R., Acehan, D., Derr, K. D., Rice, W. J., & Stokes, D. L. (2008). Cryoelectron tomography of isolated desmosomes. Biochemical Society Transactions, *36*(Pt. 2), 173-179.
- Panchal, K. M., Vyas, K. N., & Vyas, Y. L. (1999). Histogenesis of skin and its adnexa of Surti buffalo. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy, *11*(2), 158-160.
- Reynolds, E. S. (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology, *7*(1), 208-212.
- Riet-Correa, F., Barros, S. S., Damé, M. C., & Peixoto, P. V. (1994). Hereditary suprabasilar acantholytic mechanobullous dermatosis in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Veterinary Pathology, *31*(4), 450-454.
- Roxo, E., Vasconcellos, S. A., Pinheiro, S. R., Baruselli, P. S., & Macruz, R. (1997). Comparative study of the skin structure of buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cattle (Bos taurus). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, *64*(2), 117-120.
- Toyoshima, T., Yamashita, K., Furuichi, H., Shishibori, T., Itano, T., & Kobayashi, R. (1999). Ultrastructural distribution of 36-kD microfibril-associated glycoprotein (MAGP-36) in human and bovine tissues. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, *47*, 1049-1056.
- Yaeger, J. A., Church, R. L., & Tanzer, M. L. (1975). Structure of cultured fibroblasts from dermatosparaxic calves. Veterinary Pathology, *12*(1), 16-31.
- Watson, M. L. (1958). Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology, *4*, 475-478.