In vitro Activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains against Fusarium verticillioides, Fusarium subglutinans and Schizophyllum commune, which Cause Diseases in Sugarcane in Côte d'Ivoire

Authors: OKOUE Djédji; TEHUA Amoa Armist; YEO Navigué Abou; KOFFI Yao Fulgence; KEBE Ibrahima; ALLOUE-BORAUD Waze Aimée Mireille; KONE Daouda
In vitro Activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens Strains against Fusarium verticillioides, Fusarium subglutinans and Schizophyllum commune, which Cause Diseases in Sugarcane in Côte d'Ivoire
DIN
IJOEAR-SEP-2026-2
Abstract

Sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a key crop for the economy of Côte d'Ivoire. However, domestic production remains insufficient to meet domestic demand, resulting in a sugar deficit for the country. This low productivity is largely due to fungal diseases, which cause considerable economic losses. Whilst several control methods have been used, some pose risks to human health. It is against this backdrop that this study was conducted, the objective of which was to evaluate the in vitro effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains against Fusarium verticillioides, Fusarium subglutinans and Schizophyllum commune, which cause diseases in sugarcane in Côte d'Ivoire. To this end, 150 soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of healthy and diseased sugarcane plants for the isolation and phenotypic and molecular identification of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. In vitro antifungal tests were then carried out. The results showed that strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens were isolated and identified from the rhizosphere of both healthy and diseased sugarcane plants. In vitro tests showed that 95 per cent of the bacterial strains inhibited the mycelial growth of the three fungal pathogens, with inhibition rates ranging from 40.16 ± 6.9 per cent to 80.65 ± 6.5 per cent. These results suggest that Pseudomonas fluorescens, when tested under field conditions, could be used effectively as a biocontrol agent against fungal diseases in sugarcane crops in Côte d'Ivoire.

Keywords
Sugar cane Pathogenic fungus Pseudomonas fluorescens Côte d'Ivoire.
Introduction

Sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a perennial plant of the Poaceae family. It is native to New Guinea and is cultivated for its stems, which contain a sweet sap (Meslien, 2009). In 2022, global sugarcane production reached approximately 1.92 billion tonnes, accounting for 79% of total global sugar production (ChenhanTech, 2022). This sector constitutes a strategic agro-industrial sector, both for the production of sugar and for that of ethanol or energy co-products. In 2023–2024, the main producing countries were Brazil and India, with annual production ranging from 753 to 783 million tonnes and from 405 to 490 million tonnes respectively (Financial Times, 2023). Sugar cane cultivation generates economic value amounting to tens of billions of US dollars (USD). For example, the Brazilian group Raízen recorded a turnover of 47 billion USD in 2023 (Financial Times, 2023). The Illovo Sugar group (South Africa) is the leading player in Africa, exporting to the European Union, the United States and West Africa. Côte d'Ivoire is a medium-sized producer in Africa. In 2018, the country's annual sugarcane production was estimated at 1.9 million tonnes, ranking it 53rd globally and 16th in Africa (REPERCI, 2024). Within the country, sugarcane is mainly used for direct consumption or in the sugar industry. It is also used in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical sectors. Furthermore, it represents the main source of economic activity for the population in the northern part of the country (Kouamé et al., 2010). Despite the importance of sugarcane, Côte d'Ivoire continues to face a sugar deficit. This sugar deficit is generally caused by diseases affecting sugarcane cultivation, including bacterial diseases such as leaf blight caused by Xanthomonas albineans, and fungal diseases such as smut, red mould and pokkah boeng. These fungal diseases result in losses estimated at between 10 and 30 per cent of the national yield (Yao et al., 2020). Although there are no comprehensive official national data, fungal diseases cause economic losses ranging from 20 to 40 per cent of the national yield. Thus, based on an estimated national sugarcane production of around 330,000 tonnes, a 20 per cent loss equates to 66,000 tonnes, representing nearly 13 million USD in annual economic losses (Kouamé et al., 2010). These fungal diseases are characterised by symptoms such as leaf chlorosis and green mottling of varying severity. The most susceptible varieties can be literally stunted to the point of resembling tufts of grass. Sometimes the stems are covered in cankers and the internal tissues are necrotic. This deterioration of the stems leads to a reduction in their sugar content and losses in yield. These diseases have caused crop losses of up to 40 per cent in the Borotou-Koro and Zuénoula sugar complexes (Yao et al., 2020). In order to combat these pathogens effectively, pesticides – particularly synthetic fungicides from the benzimidazole, triazole and strobilurin families – are primarily used. However, the overuse of these synthetic fungicides in sugarcane plantations could lead to the emergence and rapid development of resistant strains, which would result in a resurgence of diseases (Cawoy et al., 2011). In view of these adverse consequences, it is important to find alternative solutions that will enable the continued control of plant pathogens whilst reducing the use of chemicals and also protecting the environment. These may involve the rationalisation of agricultural practices, the use of resistant plant varieties and/or the use of biopesticides (Thakore, 2006). It is against this backdrop that this study is set, the overall objective of which is to evaluate the in vitro effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains against Fusarium verticillioidesFusarium subglutinans and Schizophyllum commune, which cause diseases in sugarcane in Côte d'Ivoire.

Conclusion

This study enabled the isolation and identification of a variety of bacterial isolates from the sugarcane rhizosphere. The strains were selected on the basis of their potential antagonistic activity. The identification of bacterial isolates from the sugarcane rhizosphere revealed the species Pseudomonas fluorescens. All these bacterial strains were capable of inhibiting the three fungi they were tested against, with high inhibition rates. In view of the various results obtained, these bacterial strains could be effective biocontrol agents against fungal diseases of sugarcane in Côte d'Ivoire.

Limitations of the Study: The study was conducted under in vitro conditions, which may not fully reflect field conditions where environmental factors, microbial competition, and plant-pathogen interactions can influence biocontrol efficacy. The specific mechanisms of antagonism were not investigated directly. Field validation of the most promising strains is needed to confirm their efficacy under realistic conditions. Future research should include greenhouse and field trials, formulation development, and investigation of the mechanisms of action.

Future Research Directions: Future studies should focus on: (1) evaluating the most effective strains (PZ13 and PEZ83) under greenhouse and field conditions; (2) investigating the specific mechanisms of antagonism (antibiosis, siderophore production, lytic enzyme activity, induced systemic resistance); (3) developing effective formulation and delivery methods for field application; (4) assessing the compatibility of these strains with other disease management practices; and (5) evaluating the effects of these strains on non-target organisms and soil health.

Agriculture Journal IJOEAR Call for Papers

References
  1. Ban Koffi, L., Alloue-Boraud, W. A., Assamoi, J., Koussemon, M., & Ongenas, M. (2015). Study of protective effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens F19 against microorganisms responsible of tomato fruits (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) spoilage in Côte d'Ivoire. International Journal of Applied Science and Research, *9*, 9-16.
  2. Benzina, F., Sahir-Halouane, F., & Hamed, K. (2016). Algerian isolates of fluorescent Pseudomonas and Bacillus sp. as potential biological control against wilt pathogen (Verticillium dahliae). Plant Omics Journal, *9*(1), 48-60.
  3. Bossis, E., Lemanceau, P., Latour, X., & Gardan, L. (2000). The taxonomy of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida: Current status and need for revision. Agronomie, *20*, 51-63.
  4. Cawoy, H., Debois, D., Franzil, L., De Pauw, E., Thonart, P., & Ongena, M. (2015). Lipopeptides as main ingredients for inhibition of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus subtilis/amyloliquefaciens. Microbial Biotechnology, *8*, 281-295.
  5. Haas, D., & Defago, G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Reviews Microbiology, *3*(4), 307-319.
  6. ISO 7218. (2007). Microbiologie des aliments -- Exigences générales et recommandations (3rd ed.).
  7. Korsten, L., & Jager, E. S. D. (1995). Mode of action of Bacillus subtilis for control of avocado postharvest pathogens. South African Avocado Grower's Association Yearbook, *18*, 124-130.
  8. Kouamé, D. K., Péné, C. B., & Zouzou, M. (2010). Évaluation de la résistance variétale de la canne à sucre au foreur de tiges tropical africain (Eldana saccharina Walker) en Côte d'Ivoire. Journal of Applied Biosciences, *26*, 1614-1622.
  9. Okoue, D., Koffi, F. Y., Tehua, A. A., Kebe, I., & Boraud, M. W. A. A. (2025). Fungal profile of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) pathogens produced in Côte d'Ivoire. Biotech Research Asia, *22*(1).
  10. Ongena, M. (2014). Biopesticides: Une protection plus naturelle pour les cultures. Université de Liège. http://reflexions.ulg.ac.be
  11. Öztopuz, Ö., Pekin, G., Dong, R. P., & Eltem, R. (2018). Isolation and evaluation of new antagonist Bacillus strains for the control of pathogenic and mycotoxigenic fungi of fig orchards. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, *8*, 2764-2769.
  12. Showkat, S., Murtaza, I., Laila, O., & Ali, A. (2012). Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum and Aspergillus sp. by Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from wheat rhizosphere soil of Kashmir. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, *1*, 24-32.
  13. Silva, M. S., Broglio, S. M. F., Trindade, R. C. P., Ferreira, E. S., Gomes, I. B., & Micheletti, L. B. (2015). Toxicity and application of neem in fall armyworm. Comunicata Scientiae, *6*(3), 359-364.
  14. Suman, G., & Dikshit, A. K. (2010). Biopesticides: An eco-friendly approach for pest control. Journal of Biopesticides, 186-188.
  15. Thakore, Y. (2006). The biopesticide market for global agriculture use. Industrial Biotechnology, *2*, 194-208.
  16. Van Emden, H. F., & Services, M. W. (2004). Pest and vector control. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Vidhyasekaran, P., Sethuraman, K., Rajappan, K., & Vasumathi, K. (1997). Powder formulations of Pseudomonas fluorescens to control pigeonpea wilt. Biological Control, *8*, 166-171.
  18. Yao, K. J.-E., Kouamé, K. D., Kouamé, K. G., Kassi, K. F. J.-M., N'guessan, A. C., Eponon, E. C. G., & Koné, D. (2020). Structure of Sporisorium scitamineum isolates, the causative agent of sugarcane smut in Côte d'Ivoire. International Journal of Science and Research, *9*(3), 1376-1381.
Article Preview