Influence of secondary host plants on the embryonic and larval development of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae)
Abstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the influence of secondary host plants on the embryonic and larval development of C. maculatus. The influences of three secondary host plants were compared to the influence of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), the primary host plant in the life cycle of C. maculatus. For the experiments, C.maculatus adults were extract ed from cowpea seeds and transferred to the seeds of the two secondary host plants used in this study: striped or white Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Transferred insects were maintained for t wo years on the seeds of these plants by regular rearings before being used in each of the different experiments. To determine embryonic development time, couples were brought into contact with different seeds for laying. The eggs that were laid were then observed until they hatched. To identify the different larval stages and determine their respective development time, the seeds were first infested and then dissected at specific intervals in time. The results show a reduction in the embryonic development time in white Bambara groundnut seeds compared to the seeds of the other plants. Development time of the two early instars for all strains was significantly long on the three secondary host plant seeds than on cowpea seeds. However the opposite trend was observed for the pupalstage. Of the three plants used in this experiment, pigeon pea provides the worst conditions for larval and pupalinstar development. These results lead to better understanding of post -embryonic development of C. maculates occurring within the seeds of secondary host plants. This research provides valuable insight into developing appropriate methods for pest control.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
Insects in general and beetles in particular, are endowed with a behavioral plasticity which allows them to adapt readily to plants, whether they belong to the same family or not[1;2;3]. The diet of insects of the subfamily Bruchinae, to which Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) belongs, is characterized by a high degree of host specialization; their larvae are found inside the seeds of a small number of host plants species[4;5]. Callosobruchus maculatus is a cosmopolitan pest species of cowpea in the tropics and subtropics of the world and an important field-to-store pest of pulse crops in Africa and Asia[6]. Females lay eggs on the pods or seeds. After hatching, the larva crosses the tegument and penetrates into the seed. Larval development occurs inside the seed at the expense of food reserves located in the cotyledons and the germ [7]. Grain legumes, especially cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.) and Bambara groundnut( Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.),are very important in the diets of rural communities as rich sources of protein [8;9]in West Africa. Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)has also become a very important grain legume used in human nutrition in this area. However, because of their high susceptibility to several storage pests, they are out of reach during a long period of the year, and their nutritive potential is therefore underutilized [10;3]. Many studies have shown that cowpea is the favored host plant for development of C. maculatus. However, it is possible that this pest could also develop on unusual host species such as Bambara groundnut and pigeon pea [11;3].Some plants that are known to be favorable to C. maculatus allow its development with varying degrees of success [12;3].
Therefore, it is necessary to examine whether C. maculatus, which is already a serious pest of cowpea, could also become a key pest of these legumes. Within the Papilionoideae, most hosts of C. maculates belong to the tribe of Phaseoleae and crops which are most severely infested, are found in the genus Vigna[11].[7] have shown that C. maculatus had a longer post-embryonic development on Flemingo congesta seeds than on cowpea. Within the genus Vigna, some cowpea varieties are more susceptible than others and therefore are more readily infested [12;13]. While this beetle is oligophagous, its development capacity in the seeds of legumes such as Vicia faba (L.) remains limited [1]. These plant species seem to contain substances that would block larval development of C. maculatus within the seed. These substances have an antibiosis effect on the growth of C. maculatus. They may also influence the speed of C. maculatus embryonic development. Understanding the conditions of developing a pest on a specific host is not only important for pest control, but also for the prediction and prevention of the emergence of new pests. Callosobruchus maculatus life cycle has four larval stages. The reproductive capacity and development of C. maculates have been the focus of much research, the results of which appear to depend on the geographical origin of the strains, the legume species, and cultivar of each host species [14;15]. However, data on the embryonic and larval development of C. maculatus are very scarce. Thus, the understanding of embryonic and post-embryonic development and the factors influencing them is a challenge that needs to be addressed for successful integrated pest management. This study is based on the premise that the secondary host plants could influence the larval and embryonic development of C. maculatus. The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of two secondary host plants (white and striped Bambara groundnut and pigeon pea) on the embryonic and larval development of C. maculatus.
Conclusion
This study allowed us to demonstrate that embryonic and larval development time of C. maculatus can be prolonged by the use of secondary host plants. Indeed, the results showed that development time of the two early instars for all strains was significantly longer on the three secondary host plant seeds than on cowpea seeds.
Furthermore, for C. maculatus reared on white Bambara groundnut, embryonic development time on white Bambara groundnut was significantly lower than that on cowpea and pigeon pea. Thereby, it appears that the prolonged development within the seeds of a plant host, influence the embryonic of C. maculatus on this plant. So, C. maculatus has a potential to become a serious pest for Bambara groundnut, especially when it is exposed to the seeds of this plant for a relatively long time. However, even though cowpea and Bambara groundnut belong to the same genus, the cumulative duration of development of the nymph of C. maculatus on cowpea is short compared to that obtained on the two varieties of Bambara groundnut even after two years of development or adaptation of these plants. Pigeon pea provided the worst conditions for larval and pupal instar development. These results lead to better understanding of post -embryonic development of C. maculatus occurring within the seeds of secondary host plants. They could be used in the context of the development of adequate methods of pest control; especially for the development of an integrated pest management program against the Bruchidae in West Africa.