Sericulture in North-East India: Diversity, Production Systems, and Future Prospects
Abstract
Sericulture in the north-eastern region of India is unique in its socio-economic and cultural importance. Since all four varieties of silk—Mulberry, Tasar, and most importantly, Eri and Muga—are produced here, the region offers many opportunities for the rural economy, primarily empowering women. While possessing many potentials, sericulture in the north-eastern part of India is fraught with several problems, such as poor productivity, poor adoption of improved technologies, incidences of diseases and pests, poor quality of planting materials, poor infrastructural facilities, and poor marketing systems. The sector has seen improvement to an extent owing to advances in breeding, improvement in host plants, improved rearing practices, and supportive schemes. This review focuses on the importance, diversity, constraints, and future prospects of sericulture in the region. Taking advantage of the untapped potential of the region, proper alignment and intervention through technology can ensure success.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
Sericulture is one of the sectors of agriculture that deals with the rearing of silk worms and harvesting their cocoons, which can help boost the growth of the concept of sustainable development that integrates agriculture, forestry, and rural industry1. It is a labour intensive, agroforestry-oriented industry supporting rural livelihood that expands across the globe. India is the second largest producer of raw silk of 41,121 MT next to China leading the production supporting around 97.3 Lakh people uplifting the livelihood mainly in the rural and semi urban sectors2 . Characterized with abundant types of silk producing fauna makes the country capable of producing all the major types of natural silks- mulberry silk, Tasar, Oak Tasar, Eri, and Muga silk, made by Bombyx mori, Antheraea mylitta, Antheraea proylei, Samia cynthia ricini, and Antheraea assamensis respectively. Apart from these types of silkworms which have been commercially used to manufacture silks, the forests of northeast regions have many other types of silkmoths that have not yet been used but have great potential3.
India being major biodiversity hotspot with strong connection to socio cultural practices, harbour nearly 10% of the world species and supporting additional income to the weaker communities. The north-eastern and sub-Himalayan regions are particularly rich in wild sericigenous insects and their host plants, though only five silkworm types are commercially utilized, including mulberry and vanya silks. Besides that, silkworm cocoon and pupae serve as valuable resources with their host plant having multiple medicinal uses4.
North-Eastern part of India, which includes Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura, which is crucial for non-mulberry silk production. Various sericulture systems are supported by the region's varied topography, rainfall patterns, vegetation, and traditional textile traditions. Mulberry and oak Tasar offer further chances for livelihood diversification, while Eri and Muga silk are particularly important because to their historical connection to the area5.
The North East part of India is identified as one of the 34 biodiversity hotspots in the world due to its abundance of flora and fauna which supports the ideal ecological base for diverse sericulture practices6. Holding the unique ability of producing all varieties of silk, northeast sericulture is embedded in the cultural traditions and involves both genders, especially in the production of Eri silk and geographical indicator (GI) tag Muga silk. According to socio-economic studies, the economic benefits of sericulture have a better ratio compared to several crops produced in agriculture. Eri and Muga silk production is mainly centred on the states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura with marginal involvement of mulberry silks. Even though the income level from this activity is fairly stable compared to other cash crops, there are still limitations to its development due to several constraints7. Moreover, Eri silk has less need for investment in capital resources but provides a large employment opportunity, which is quite beneficial for rural development in India8. This review is to integrates current state of sericultural knowledge and existing literature of the North East India with regard to their exclusive silk resources, sericulture methods, constraints faced, and development prospects, which can facilitate sustainable development leading to economic improvement and stability promoting rural areas where sericultural activities are growing.
Conclusion
Sericulture in Northeast India stands out because it is both an economic and cultural activity. The region has a rich variety of silks, including both mulberry and wild types. Many rural households, especially women in tribal and farming communities, rely on sericulture for their livelihoods. In recent years, the production of Eri and Muga silk has grown steadily, thanks to government and research efforts. However, challenges like poor seed quality, pests, diseases, and climate risks still limit productivity. Addressing these issues calls for a systems approach that improves seed and host plant quality, uses integrated pest management, and strengthens market connections. There is a lack of social research on how technology is adopted and on the economics of sericulture. For the sector to develop sustainably, policy and research must work together. Policies should support small-scale rearers with extension services and credit, help women’s sericulture businesses, and encourage planting more silk host trees. Researchers should also collaborate with local communities to make sure new technologies, such as improved silkworm hybrids and digital tools, are suitable and can be used effectively. With its natural advantages and the right focus on social and technical challenges, sericulture in Northeast India could do much more to improve rural livelihoods and protect its unique silk heritage.
References
- Grześkowiak, J., Łochyńska, M., & Frankowski, J. (2022). Sericulture in terms of sustainable development in agriculture. Problemy Ekorozwoju, *17*(2), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.23
- Devi, Y. S., Hossain, A., Lalremruatpuia, V., & Raviraj, V. S. (2024). Effect of UV radiation on physiological performance of silkworm Bombyx mori. Biological Forum, *16*(6), 221-229.
- Natesh, S. (2008). Silk biotechnology unfurling new possibilities. Biotechnology News, *3*(5), 3.
- Ghosh, A., Gangopadhyay, D., & Ray, M. (2019). Seribiodiversity and their role in sustainable development in India. International Journal of Plant and Environment, *5*(4), 243-246.
- Baishya, M., Barman, H., & Rahman, S. A. S. (2019). Present status of eri-muga culture in NE region and related biodiversity resources as tool for sustainable economic uplifting of seri-stakeholders. International Journal of Life Sciences and Scientific Research, *5*(3), 2284-2290. https://iijls.com/currentissue/Html_SSR-IIJLS_1612.htm
- Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, *403*, 853-858.
- Sharma, S., Bhagat, A. V., Bhalerao, S. S., Rambhai, P. K., & Rajput, Y. V. (2025). A conceptual review on sericulture in Northeast India: Viability, opportunities and policy pathways. Archives of Current Research International, *25*(9), 230-241.
- Dewangan, S. K. (2013). Livelihood opportunities through sericultural model of Gharghoda tribal block, Raigarh dist. American Journal of Environmental Science, *9*(4), 343-347. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2013.343.347
- Barah, B. C. (2007). Strategies for agricultural development in the North-East India: Challenges and emerging opportunities. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, *62*(1).
- Viswanathan, K. U. (2015). Is growth in agriculture propelled by its allied sectors in North-East India? Agricultural Economics Research Review, *28*, 69-80.
- Arora, G. S. (1979). Taxonomic studies of some of the Indian non-mulberry silk moths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India, *16*, 11 pls.
- Peigler, R. S., & Naumann, S. (2003). A revision of the silkmoth genus Samia (pp. 227+).
- Narzary, D., & Boro, I. (2025). Silkworm rearing practices in northeast India: A review of traditional and scientific methods. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, *13*(4), 190-192. https://doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2025.v13.i4c.9554
- Seidel, C. L., & Peigler, R. S. (2018). Entomological aspects of sericulture based on Antheraea assamensis and Samia ricini (Saturniidae) in Assam and Meghalaya. Tropical Lepidoptera Research.
- Keisa, T. J., Luikham, R., Singh, S., & Vijayakumari, K. M. (2022). Biodiversity of wild silkmoths in north eastern India. Plant Archives, *22*, 45-49.
- Sarkar, K. (2020). Studies on the effect of different types of feeding on the commercial characters of mulberry silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) in West Bengal: A review. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, *13*(3), 305-321.
- Vishaka, G. V., Rathore, M. S., Chandrashekharaiah, M., Nadaf, H. A., & Sinha, R. B. (2020). Tasar for tribes: A way of life. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, *8*(1), 374-377.
- Lokeshwari, R., & Shantibala, T. (2010). A review on the fascinating world of insect resources: Reason for thoughts. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, *2010*.
- Jolly, M. S., Narasimhanna, M. N., Sinha, S. S., & Sen, S. K. (1969). Interspecific hybridisation in Antheraea. Indian Journal of Heredity, *1*, 45-48.
- Goel, R. K. (2017). Temperate tasar culture. In Industrial entomology (pp. 321-344). Springer Singapore.
- Central Silk Board (CSB). (2025). Annual report 2024–25. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
- Central Silk Board (CSB). (2024). Annual report 2023–24. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
- Central Silk Board (CSB). (2023). Annual report 2022–23. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
- Central Silk Board (CSB). (2022). Annual report 2021–22. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
- Central Silk Board (CSB). (2021). Annual report 2020–21. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
- Central Silk Board (CSB). (2020). Annual report 2019–20. Ministry of Textiles, Government of India.
- Sarmah, M. C., Ahmed, S. A., & Sarkar, B. N. (2012). Research & technology development, byproduct management and prospects in Eri culture–A review. Munis Entomology & Zoology, *7*(2), 1006-1016.
- Ahmed, S. A., Singh, N. I., & Sarkar, C. R. (2015). Role of forest biodiversity in conservation of non-mulberry (vanya) silk in India. Munis Entomology & Zoology, *10*(1), 342-357.
- Singh, K. C., & Chakravorty, R. (2006). Present status and constraints of eri silkworm conservation in India. In Proceedings of the Strategies for Non-Mulberry Germplasm Maintenance (pp. 88-96). Jorhat, Assam, India.
- Singh, S., Jigyasu, D., Subrahmanyam, G., Sangannavar, P., Kumar, R., Choudhury, B., & Vijayakumari, K. (2022). Conservation of muga silkworm, Antheraea assamensis Helfer in the natural habitats at different geographical location. Plant Archives, 9725210.
- Neog, K., Gogoi, S. N., & Chakravorty, R. (2005). Present status and constraints of muga silkworm host plant germplasm conservation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Strategies for Maintenance of Non-Mulberry Silkworm and Host Plant Germplasm (pp. 1-10). Central Muga Eri Research & Training Institute, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, Assam, India.
- Arunkumar, K. P., Nath, D., Mahesh, D. S., Nath, U., Luikham, R., & Vijayakumari, K. M. (2022). A multipronged approach for improving seed availability during commercial rearing seasons in muga ecosystem. Plant Archives, *22*(Special Issue), 69-74.
- Gogoi, R., Gogoi, G., Saud, R. K., Bhuyan, N., Barthakur, A. K., Neog, M., & Pathak, P. K. (2023). A study on constraints of ericulture in Dhemaji district of Assam. Indian Journal of Extension Education, *59*(1), 166-169.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). Introduction: Importance of sericulture in developing countries. https://www.fao.org/4/AD108E/ad108e0a.htm
- Central Muga Eri Research and Training Institute. (n.d.). Overview. Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. https://cmerti.res.in/overview/
- Directorate of Sericulture, Government of Manipur. (2019, January 15). A brief history of sericulture in Manipur. https://serimanipur.nic.in/en/brief-history-sericulture-manipur/
- Sathyanarayana, K., Manjunatha, A. V., Devika, C. M., & Mishra, R. K. (2018). Mahila Kisan Sashaktkaran Pariyojana (MKSP): Reeling sustainability in the tasar sericulture based tribal livelihoods through alternative market support systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, *32*(3S), 107-117. https://indianjournals.com/article/ijam-32-3s-011
- Devi, Y. S., Hossain, A., Devi, W. S., Yumnam, D., Majumdar, S., & VS, R. (2025). Assessment of stable strains of eri silkworms (Samia ricini) for commercial silk production under the climate of Manipur. Advances in Research, *26*(1), 369-377.
- Sapana, W., Singh, S., Surjalata, Y., Hossain, A., Yumnam, D., Majumdar, S., & Singh, S. (2024). Impact of seasonal variations on cocoon yield and its attributed traits of eri silkworm (Samia ricini, Donovan). Biological Forum, *16*(7), 336-340.
- Devi, Y. S., Verma, A. K., Nalavadi, C., Hossain, A., & Pramanick, B. (2024). Optimizing preservation duration of mulberry silkworm crossbreed eggs in cold storage. Biological Forum, *16*(8), 249-356.